Monday 3 June 2013

9/11 Plus 12.


So the conspiracy theorists are still working on 9/11. It’s an interesting phrase ‘conspiracy theory’, it conjures up people stitching fact together to suit some outlandish explanation of events, usually implicating people in high places. Where the official explanation majestically enter as ‘the truth’ conspiracy theories intrude as misleading conclusions of an over fertile brain with hidden motives, though in the case of 9/11 I suspect the reverse is true. Demonstrators and protesters are, almost by their own definition, on the back foot. The situation somehow defines them as a streaker at a football match, not a team member or official, but someone who is intrinsically offensive and out of place. In the same way that the unconscious mind has little time for the negative, as in “don’t do that” imparts “…do that”, the position of ‘ being against that’ hands the position of power to ‘that’. The obvious conclusion is to not be a negative protester but a positive advocate of something better, or not even better because that holds an element of comparison, something different but on the same subject. On a similar theme don’t herd into what can easily be labelled a mob, dismissed and corralled. Be identifiable as ‘a part’ of the whole but spaced say twenty feet apart from other parts of the whole. That way a group of leading thinkers can cover a large area, be visible and not rounded up. How did I get onto this, oh yes, 9/11. As well as hundreds of dubious associations and financial occurrences, numerous eyewitness accounts, expert and indisputable photographic evidence the official version of events follows the simple explanation of terrorism; terrorism by Al Quida operatives. But because all the above has been documented by ‘conspiracy theorists’ pitching ‘against’ the official ‘truth’ their hard evidence is named and lamed as subversive speculation. The planes that hit the twin towers were air force planes (no windows) using an automatic guidance system. (visible pod under fuselage) The towers (all three) were brought down by sequenced thermite explosions. (heard by firemen and others) The Pentagon was not hit by a plane (only a missile could make the tight flight path) and photographic evidence shows no damage from the ‘planes’ engines either side of the small impact zone. The engine debris inside the Pentagon was identified as not from a passenger plane and eyewitnesses heard a bomb blast not an impact explosion. Of course something that has fur, four legs and a tail, purrs and laps milk might be a tumble dryer but we have four of them and we call them cats.

No comments:

Post a Comment