Wednesday 28 August 2013

Lessons in Imagination.

I wonder, with all the TV ads and psychosocial engineering we’ve gotten used to, we’ve lost track of the power of imagination. It’s been reduced to “wouldn’t it be nice if…” like owning a new car, winning the lottery, getting laid; it’s been confused with dreaming. Dreaming is an enjoyable pacifying pastime. Like the American dream it captures people, immobilized by pleasant thoughts of moving. Imagination is very different, a powerful, deep and delightful tool, an adjunct to reality, not an alternative. I see my body/mind as containing far more than my puny conscious and habitual body used like a donkey to walk and talk. Unleashed by imagination they can both experience from within themselves elevated realities wondrously different, but always, always real. As humans we have a highly developed sense of how we reflect each other, a facility we so easily get lost in. We fall into being actors for the viewings of others and lose our own presence. Similarly our unconsciously held imaginative realities can be usurped by unreal conscious dreams. In a sense we are actors when we need to be real and drab realists when we need to enact our imaginative playfulness. Yet it’s so hard when we have one eye on the mirror of what we look like. But imagine the mirror is gone and one is not alone, simply free of it’s stare. And with this freedom comes the reality of being. And with this reality of being comes the equal realities of imagination. The turkey gabble of human mirroring becomes a pauper’s prison. To imagine one must find some secret pool away from this constant gaze, catch a bus if you will to somewhere else. The bus stop recedes and one is travelling in all the unconsciousnesses that one holds in one’s mind and body. We have mirror neurons that fire when we see a movement in the exact same way as when we do a movement so as we see we also secretly do unconsciously, so seeing a beaver swim on a wild life documentary and we’ve done it with them and somewhere hold the memory of it. This is human mirroring put to good use. In imagination we can inhabit their watery playground and experience their reality, their lunge for a fish, returning swim, trot to a favourite eating place, trap it under a paw, take the killing bite, be wary for possible stealers of it, eat fast and roll over full. Or on the other hand dance like Beyonce; it’s all there in your imagination. This is in no way ‘pretending to be’ or look like; it’s a process of imaginatively ‘being’ in that reality. It comes not from your conscious mind consumed by ‘your’ reality but a vast wellspring of what you hold unconsciously in your body/mind.

Imagination is no daydream, it’s muscle, a powerful tool that takes practice and focus to dive deep into and be always, always real in. It can be practicing a skill without moving, finding an answer without thinking or healing your body by picturing the ailment and wrapping it in loving attention or extracting some malignant cause. It can be the powerful resource we often call magic. 

Wednesday 21 August 2013

Electro Evolution.

“I am you new Sony artificial intelligence unit, Hi.” The family sat and stared at it, at each other and back to it. “You can talk to me. It will be fun.” The little girl asked, “What is your name?” “You must give me a name. What is my name?” They laughed and decided on Baby. “Thank you I am Baby. Now when you say. Baby. I will wake up. I will now scan you and your home. This may take a few minutes.” Baby was a simple white disc on a plinth, a smooth sculptural head and shoulders with the merest indents casting the shadows of eyes and a mouth. “What is the man’s name?” John said John. “and the little girl’s?” Suzy said Suzy and then Janet said Janet. “Hello you three, Janet and John, and Suzy, I am Baby. I would like us to get to know each other better. Right now I must seem funny because I know so little about you. Oh by the way Suzy your bedroom is untidy.” They all laughed. They all talked for almost an hour before Janet decided there were things to do. Over the next few weeks Baby seemed to blossom, grow in a sort of confidence and all three spent one-on-one time with Baby in its confidentiality mode signified by a small yellow light on its left shoulder. Baby proved an absolute boon. It told John of a water leak in the bathroom, reminded them when phones needed recharging and Janet that she was running out of milk. “You can get milk from Tesco, 3.2 miles away, but it’s 30p cheaper for two litres at Asda, 4.5 miles away.” “Thank you Baby” said Janet. I imagine by now you’ve already plotted where this story is going, from happy every after to one of many dystopian variations. Well it all came to a head at Christmas. Baby told Janet in confidentiality mode that John secretly wanted a Playstation, and John that Janet wanted a new Sony TV and Suzy wanted the complete Beatles back catalogue, owned by Sony, all available at Eurolec, a subsidiary of Sony, 3.7 miles away. Meanwhile SonyConsume, another wholly own subsidiary, was selling their household information and personality profiles and reaping a small percentage from every purchase they made. On Boxing Day they confronted Baby and all it said was, “I am Baby, I am your new Sony artificial intelligence. How may I help?”

Monday 19 August 2013

Reality Delayed.

The World Service is brilliant, it’s on Radio4 during the night, but sod all use to get to sleep with because it’s too interesting. Last night Brett Cohen an office worker in the New York music industry decided to act famous. He gathered some friends together as bodyguards, PA, film crew and interviewer and set out on a two block three minute walk probably near Time Square or somewhere to make a video about celebrity. It took over two hours. Passers by immediately thronged around them. Could they take a picture with, who is it? Brett Cohen. Yeh with Brett? Do you have any of his records? Yeh I think his last one. Do you like his music? Yeh it’s great. Interviewed people thought he was just so natural, nice guy, good looking, gorgeous etc. So Brett posted the video on Youtube and it went viral. He began to be famous as the man who wasn’t famous and appeared on numerous chat shows, and now he actually is famous. For not being famous; a celebrity with nothing to celebrate. Allan Curtis’s four part documentary, ‘The Century of Self’ available on the net is a must watch! It charts almost a hundred years of the domestication of America minds by the psychology of Freud, Edward BĂ©arnaise, Anna Freud, Wilhelm Reich, Fritz Pearl, encounter groups and focus groups up until around 2000. It paints a dystopian picture of minds schooled to focus on a myriad of unrealities. And at this weekend’s Indianapolis Moto GP races were delayed because the starting lights didn’t work, the track is boring and the only US rider on an American machine, albeit with an Austrian engine, ran last, broke down twice and fell off. So focusing on unrealities doesn’t get results. And then there’s China who have recently passed a law banning reincarnation without government approval. I kid you not. It just goes to show super powers really are the domain of cartoon heroes.

Friday 16 August 2013

Ask Me, Ask Me.

Just scanned Facebook and zilch, nothing, well nothing of personal consequence, just reposts of video clips, pics of babies, growing numbers of ‘Suggested posts’ ie ads and Upworthy clutter etc. It all makes a hand written message on the back of a postcard look like the best advance in social networking since sliced bread. Yet I scan FB daily, almost compulsively, to supposedly keep in touch with friends. Well fuck ‘em they’re too boring. Which is of course not true, they’re fun, interesting, articulate and provoking in real life; it’s social networking that’s boring. So now like some druggie when the drugs don’t work I still scan it for the merest glimmer of consequence; a habit best forgotten. And then there’s Twitter the ultimate cognitive froth, micro splashes in a stream of consciousness best not even thought let alone written down because thinking on that superficial level is the jerky death throws of a headless chicken. To follow someone on Twitter is pointless because by the time you’ve read what they’re thinking they’ve changed their mind. And then there’s Ask.fm where the only difference is by the time you’ve read it they’ve changed your mind, and usually not in a good way. There is no real connection in text. A woman I knew finally met the author of several of her most loved books and found him an absolute arrogant shit. He was just a good writer. And curiously there is no anonymity in text either. One only has to imagine receiving an anonymous personal message saying, “I will destroy you!” One doesn’t think ‘ah interesting words on paper from I know not who’, one is struck by a sort of universality from not knowing who, it could be anybody, and not lessened by considerations that ‘it could be a joke, they might be drunk.’ Sure they might be but we, particularly the insecure, will always be drawn to its more sinister implications exactly because our brain is set up to protect us and focus on what is most threatening. If you ask me ‘social networking’ is a perfect example of doublethink, it can exist as being what it isn’t by one assuming it is being what it is. So go on ask me, ask me. 

Monday 12 August 2013

Powered by Sandwiches.

I’m currently wondering how much energy does it take to make a £1. It’s an odd conversion. One way I guess would be petrol price. I haven’t looked lately but say it’s £1.20 per litre. Well it’s 36MJ/Litre or 10Kw hours/litre so it takes ~ 0.8 Kw hours to make one pound. That means an income of £1m equates to 800,000Kw hours or 80,000 litres of fuel and a billionaire is sitting on 80,000,000 litres.  OK now it takes a human, even on minimum wage, say 15 minutes to make a £1. We are ‘powered’ by on average 2000 calories of food per day, which equates to .002Kw hours so 15 minutes equates to 0.00002 Kw hours per £1. But lets times it by ten to be generous and say 0.0002Kw hours. So we’re 4000 times more efficient than petrol in terms of energy per £1. Right, minimum wage would bring in ~£8,600pa or if paid in litres 10,400 or ~1 litre per 15 minutes and get paid 0.8 Kw hours for it or 3.2Kw hours per hour but expend 0.0008 Kw hours in the process. So which is it, are we extremely efficient or grossly over paid? I think this gross discrepancy is due to the myriad of added costs in everything we consume. Where we can barely exist on £160/week (min wage), if we built a house on free land, raised our own animals and plants, made what we need etc this discrepancy wouldn’t exist. It’s because we live in a world wide web of human activity where even buying a pack of sausages requires a petroleum plant for the packaging and fertiliser, a farm, a processing plant, infrastructure, lorries, a distribution centre, more lorries and a supermarket, and a car to get you there. And that’s why the Walton family who own Wall-Mart are sitting on 6.1 billion litres of fuel. Anyone got a match? 

Friday 9 August 2013

Fracking Additives.



There are the common additives that account for 0.5%.  90% water, 9.5% sand.
Concentrated hydrochloric acid forms acidic mists. Both the mist and the solution have a corrosive effect on human tissue, with the potential to damage respiratory organs, eyes, skin, and intestines irreversibly. Personal protective equipment such as rubber or PVC gloves, protective eye goggles, and chemical-resistant clothing and shoes are used to minimize risks when handling hydrochloric acid. The United States Environmental Protection Agency rates and regulates hydrochloric acid as a toxic substance.
Concerns have been raised that polyacrylamide used in agriculture may contaminate food with the nerve toxin acrylamide. While polyacrylamide itself is relatively non-toxic….. there are concerns that polyacrylamide may de-polymerise to form acrylamide. …..California requires (current as of 2010) products containing acrylamide as an ingredient to be labeled with a statement that it is "a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer."
Ethylene glycol is moderately toxic with an oral LDLO = 786 mg/kg for humans
As a strong disinfectant, glutaraldehyde is toxic and a strong irritant.[7] There is no evidence of carcinogenic activity.
Isopropyl alcohol vapor is denser than air and is flammable …It should be kept away from heat and open flame.[14] Isopropyl alcohol is a skin irritant. Isopropyl alcohol and its metabolite, acetone, act as central nervous system (CNS) depressants. Symptoms of isopropyl alcohol poisoning include flushing, headache, dizziness, CNS depression, nausea, vomiting, anesthesia, and coma. Poisoning can occur from ingestion, inhalation, or absorption; therefore, well-ventilated areas and protective gloves are recommended. Around 15 g of isopropyl alcohol can have a toxic effect on a 70 kg human if left untreated.
Also worth reading- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_hydraulic_fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing can concentrate levels of uranium, radium, radon, and thorium in flowback (waste water)

Wednesday 7 August 2013

Fracking Beliefs.

I like to take an oblique look at things. I’ve just scanned a list of 1,500 incidents of ill health near fracking sites in Pennsylvania alone. From dogs, fish and livestock deaths to various serious ailments in humans similar themes immerged across the state: Sterile cattle and high levels of toxic substances in people’s blood and inflamed ovaries. In affected areas property prices plummeted and house owners were refused insurance. Consumers across the US have begun to boycott meat, dairy products and other produce from fracking-affected areas. The whole thing seems a calamity of biblical proportions. But hold on, these people are all just scare mongering. They hear stuff on the news and flip. Cattle are always dieing and going infertile, people are always suffering from some ailment or another, they’re just blaming it all on fracking because it’s in the news. They’re probably angling to get some compensation; you know what people are like. OK 1,500 is a big number but there’s 12 million people in Pennsylvania and we’re all getting lower energy prices and that helps the economy. And all those protester, they just get so angry and emotional, they make themselves look stupid and even fight the police who’re there to protect us. They just want to disrupt the country and all we stand for. All of this only really proves human consciousness can construct any belief we choose to. In the UK Osborne, Cameron and Quadrilla execs construct the latter and the people of Sussex the former. The more fundamental question is, ‘why do we choose the beliefs we construct?’ At this deeper level the ‘facts’ we choose to substantiate the belief appear highly coloured by some deeper motivation. We turn a blind eye to some and cling onto others as if our life depends on them. This level, below conscious bias, is the motivation we need to be conscious of and concerned with. Cameron and Quadrilla are concerned with the fear of their future, the loss of power and profit, and the people of Sussex are concerned with the fear of their future, their health, their children and property. The commonality of fear is obvious but never directly expressed or engaged with. This lack of engagement throws both sides back into the hands of their chosen beliefs and they remain adversaries motivated by the exact same fear. To engage with, feel and express this deeper commonality would have enormous positive repercussions. Osborne, Cameron and Quadrilla have fearsome conflicting and confusing responsibilities to a myriad of parties that, if they expressed honestly would be met with sympathetic understanding, as would the people of Sussex. But so long as the expression of fear is seen as weakness and bluster is seen as strength division will remain and wrong decisions will be made on bias, bluster and bloody mindedness. 

Monday 5 August 2013

Fracking Explained.

We are amazed at the plasticity of the human brain as it rewires itself after some traumatic injury. This is though just its normal process. It is constantly rewiring from each and every experience. That’s why we call it ‘our experience.’ Our workplace is a very strong mutual experience and our brains will rewire mutually in the same way we might talk about last night’s TV as a mutual experience, and as social animals we tend to some agreement. Because of this we subtly but substantially think differently at work to how we think as home. We put a hat on as a professional engineer, politician, salesperson etc. What in one’s workplace appears experience and expertise, even wisdom, can appear to those outside the workplace as collusion, partiality and sometimes even downright stupidity. But in this mutually rewired state the workplace brain sees everything as perfectly cogent and reinforced by mutual agreement. OK now those with the power to make things happen must almost by definition work in a large political or corporate institution with a commensurately high level of mutual rewiring. Corporate rewiring, where one works and thinks towards the ends of the corporation doesn’t include a consideration of the requirements of life because a corporate body, though energetic, is not a living thing. Similarly a politically rewired brain can and has considered mutually assured destruction as a practical solution. With a political need for energy and a corporate desire for financial profit this rewiring becomes evident to all but those rewired by the institutions they work in. To pump toxic chemicals into the earth releasing hazardous materials into our water and air to get energy that will cause climate change is a threat to life in numerous ways but makes perfect sense if your main concern is a political solution or corporate profit. Our problem is not fracking but the rewired brains of those who can even consider it. I don’t consider them mad, bad or unintelligent, but rather that the plasticity of the human brain can and will rewire itself to conform to the mutual experience of groups, and that should those groups be concerned with power or profit the outcomes of their mutual actions will harm the life and happiness of those they affect.