As a change from my normal blogs for the next week or so I'm going to post my personal PhD project about the brain. It's approach is to in a sense reverse engineer the brain's evolutionary process. Hope you like it.
Brain1 Introduction.
As we celebrate the 150th anniversary of Darwin’s
publication ‘The Origin of Species’, brain science is making massive strides
forward. Though we acknowledge that we are the product of evolution and the
survival of the fittest we rarely consider the development and nature of our
brain and sensory system from this viewpoint. Though we are aware of our
progress from crouching ape to standing man and of the brain’s long evolution
before that, we rarely consider the inner evolution of the brain and how that
evolution has formed and re-formed it over the millennia. It is the basis of
our niche potential as an animal and it seems important that we explore how the
necessities of evolution might have formed our brain’s function and capabilities.
Where the
physical sciences have their roots in first principles it is notable that the
study of human behaviour has never taken that approach believing it too
mechanistic to describe our complex, esoteric cognition and behaviour. I
suggest our reaction is a form of defensiveness. Without thinking we see
ourselves, our species, as not simply another animal but in a category of one,
as perfectly capable but for our many individual weaknesses and foibles. Might
it be though that we have intrinsic incapabilities?
In these
essays, though I accept the experiential programming of the brain is individual
and infinitely variable, I am searching for the ‘first principles’ of its
functionality as might have been formed by the necessities its our long
evolution.
It is neither a neuroscience view nor that of evolutionary
psychology but rather it stems from my education in maths/physics, art/design
and my career as an innovator, and more recently training in numerous strands
of therapy. It is I believe unique in being essentially an engineer’s approach.
These essays will suggest our best option is to identify our intrinsic and
universal incapabilities and work with them rather than assume all our failures
are due to the weaknesses of individuals. One would never assume steel to be
perfectly strong and conclude every structural failure was due to some local
imperfection. Steel and our cognitive powers have very finite
capabilities.
Note. Though the phrase ‘survival of the fittest’ is
generally used I suggest it adds a certain misleading colour to our
understanding. I suggest it’s more accurate to say the ‘proliferation of the
best adapted.’ Only when the best adapted proliferates and becomes dominant do
the less well-adapted struggle to survive. Taking this alternative phrase the
emphasis is on adaptation rather than fitness and proliferation rather than
survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment