9/11 Is Falling Down.

Unlike the three building’s that fell on 9/11 it’s taking a lot longer for the official version of events to collapse. From day one there have been inconvenient facts conveniently dismissed as conspiracy theories. Why did Building 7 collapse at free fall speed? (heat from burning office furniture) Why did the twin towers collapse? (explained by the NIST inquiry) Why didn’t the US air force scramble? (on a training mission) Why weren’t there wings on the outside of the Pentagon and nobody saw the plane? (nobody was looking) Why did firemen hear sequential explosions inside the building? (they were mistaken) etc etc.  But getting back to the NIST enquiry. Though people found thermite in the steel residues, though NASA showed satellite pictures of intense heat in the ruins, again etc etc, they did not investigate the possibility of demolition deeming it ‘too improbable.’ Over the years that followed various structural engineers have evaluated the NIST findings. Why were plates wrongly sized and structural elements left out in their calculations, why did they underestimate structural strength and overestimate kinetic energies? In 2014 Tony Szamboti published a white paper, "Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports". It lists 25 areas where NIST made errors in their calculations to ‘prove’ the official explanation. If NIST can’t refute these findings where does that leave us? If building 7 couldn’t be brought down by their calculations it can only have been a controlled demolition. (that would take weeks to prepare) If their pancake explanation of the twin towers collapse is proved technically impossible then the only other explanation is a manufactured collapse. If so who ordered it? Who had the influence to direct NIST to pursue their erroneous conclusions? Who might then be found responsible for the thousands that died and the false wars in the Middle East? In the end it will all come down to the meticulous calculations of structural engineers working outside NIST, and they’re gaining ground. There’s a lot to play for. 

Listen here http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/2014/590-int-67