The situation in Syria is appalling. Not for the first
time Asad has used chlorine gas against his own people. We reach that
conclusion, firstly because he would profit from it, and secondly because he
refuses outside investigation that could prove it. This is a war crime and Asad
will at some future time be called accountable. No western action will be taken
because we have no legal right to intervene militarily but condemn in the
strongest possible terms Asad’s use of chlorine gas. We recognise Russia is
assisting Asad and any intervention would risk the escalation of the conflict
but are surprised in Russia’s apparent support and condoning of Asad’s war
crime. If Russia continues to block outside investigation of Asad’s actions we
can only assume Mr Putin might also be accused of aiding a war crime. We do not
consider that an appropriate course of action for a member of the UN. To
resolve this situation and avoid further disastrous escalation we would like to
see Russia reconsider their unqualified support for Asad. Whilst we recognise
Russia’s right to pursue a foreign policy we might not like when we see that
policy as not living up to internationally agreed humanitarian standards we
also have the right to condemn it, not only for the people of Syria but also by
implication other states affected by it and ultimately the people of Russia
herself. Those internationally agreed standards are not a matter of opinion
they are the hard lessons learnt from our joint history of conflicts where
certain actions lead to resolution, happiness and prosperity and others to
hostility, warfare and destruction. Our current choice to not oppose Asad and
Russia is not made from weakness, but to remember those lessons of history so
horrifically played out in Syria thus far.
No comments:
Post a Comment